Our Company Blog.


LASER PRECISION CUTTING, INC

  • Laser or Stamped? Choosing the Optimal Solution for Production Success

    Laser or Stamped? Choosing the Optimal Solution for Production Success
    Dr. Jerusha Myrick

    In manufacturing, the question isn’t simply “What’s the cheapest part?”

    The real question is:

    What is the optimal solution for our production, budget, and long-term operational flexibility?

    When I taught Management Science in the Business Department at UNC Asheville, we spent significant time analyzing decision models that help organizations determine the optimal solution, not just the lowest immediate cost, but the best overall outcome when considering risk, flexibility, and total system impact.

    TThat same principle applies when evaluating laser cut parts versus stamped parts.

    Tooling Investment: Upfront Cost vs. Flexibility

    Stamped parts require tooling.
    Dies can cost thousands (sometimes tens of thousands) of dollars before production even begins.

    That means:

    • Capital approval
    • Tool build time
    • Testing and adjustments
    • Financial risk if the design changes

    Laser cutting requires no hard tooling.

    Parts are cut directly from CAD files. If a revision is needed, the file is updated, and production continues.

    From a management science perspective, tooling introduces fixed cost and rigidity. Laser cutting reduces fixed investment and increases adaptability. In many production environments, this moves the decision closer to the optimal solution.

    Lead Time and Speed to Production

    Stamped parts involve:

    • Tool design
    • Tool manufacturing
    • First article testing
    • Possible revisions

    Laser cutting allows:

    • Immediate nesting
    • Rapid setup
    • Faster turnaround

    When speed to market matters, flexibility often becomes a critical variable in determining the optimal solution.

    Volume Considerations

    Stamping typically makes financial sense when:

    • Annual volumes are extremely high
    • Designs are stable
    • Production runs are long-term and predictable

    Laser cutting is often ideal when:

    • Volumes are low to mid-range
    • Demand fluctuates
    • Multiple part variations are required
    • Engineering revisions are likely

    In management science terms, when variability increases, rigid systems become less efficient. Flexible systems often produce the optimal outcome across a wider range of demand scenarios.

    Cash Flow and Inventory Strategy

    Stamping often requires larger production runs to justify the investment in tooling.

    Laser cutting allows manufacturers to:

    • Order smaller batch sizes
    • Reduce excess inventory
    • Improve cash flow
    • Adjust production as demand shifts

    For purchasing agents focused on lean manufacturing principles, reducing carrying costs and preserving working capital is frequently part of the optimal solution calculation.

    Design Complexity and Precision

    Laser cutting excels at:

    • Intricate geometries
    • Tight tolerances
    • Complex cut patterns
    • Frequent design revisions

    Stamped parts may require additional operations for complex features, increasing handling and setup time.

    Secondary Processes Strengthen the Optimal Outcome

    At Laser Precision Cutting, we go beyond cutting. We provide:

    • Bending
    • Tapping
    • Countersinking
    • Deburring
    • Welding

    Consolidating secondary processes reduces:

    • Vendor transfers
    • Administrative overhead
    • Freight costs
    • Quality risk

    When you evaluate total system efficiency, reducing touchpoints often improves the overall optimal solution.

    So Which Process Is Right?

    If your application involves extremely high, stable annual volumes with minimal design change, stamping may provide long-term efficiency.

    If your production requires flexibility, faster turnaround, lower upfront capital investment, and scalable volume, laser cutting often becomes the optimal solution.

    The key is not choosing what is universally “better.”
    The key is identifying what is optimal for your specific production model.

    Let’s Evaluate Your Application

    Every project has unique constraints and decision variables.

    If you are evaluating laser cutting versus stamping, we would be glad to review your drawings and projected volumes and walk through the economics with you.

    📍 Laser Precision Cutting
    181 Reems Creek Rd. #3
    Weaverville, NC 28787
    📞 828-658-0644
    📧 sales@lpcutting.com

  • How Production Jobs Are Quoted And Why Quantity Matters

    If you’ve ever looked at a quote and wondered why the price per piece decreases when quantities increase,  you’re not alone. At Laser Precision Cutting, we believe informed customers make better decisions, so we want to pull back the curtain on how production jobs are quoted and what really goes into the price. 

    Below is an example of 2 parts quoted in quantities of 1, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100:

    Quoting Is More Than Just Cut Time

    It’s easy to assume a quote is based only on how long a laser runs. In reality, cutting time is just one piece of the puzzle. Every production job includes a set of fixed processes that happen whether we’re cutting 1 part or 1,000 parts.

    These include:

    • Programming and setup
    • Material sourcing and handling
    • Sheet loading and changeovers
    • Quality checks and documentation
    • Part sorting, packaging, and preparation for shipping

    The first four steps take roughly the same amount of time no matter the quantity.

    In addition, many jobs require secondary processes after cutting, such as:

    • Bending or forming
    • Tapping
    • Countersinking
    • Deburring and edge finishing

    Each of these steps requires equipment setup, operator time, and quality checks. Like laser setup, much of this time is required regardless of quantity.

    That’s why smaller orders often carry a higher cost per part; the setup and overhead are spread across fewer pieces.

    Why Unit Cost Decreases as Quantity Increases

    When you order higher quantities, those fixed costs are distributed across more parts. The result is a lower unit price, even though the total order value may be higher.

    For example:

    • A 10-part order with bending and tapping must absorb laser setup, press brake setup, tooling changes, and inspection across just 10 pieces
    • A 100-part order spreads those same setup and processing costs across 100 pieces

    The process is the same. The difference is how those costs are distributed.

    This is why production runs are always more cost-effective than very small lot orders, especially when secondary operations are involved.

    How Secondary Processes Affect Pricing

    Secondary processes add value by delivering parts that are ready to assemble or install but they also add time and labor. Pricing for operations like bending, tapping, countersinking, and deburring reflects:

    • Setup and tooling requirements
    • Machine time
    • Skilled labor
    • Inspection and quality assurance

    In many cases, the first bend or first tapped hole is the most expensive, because that’s where setup occurs. Additional parts benefit from that initial setup, which is why quantity plays such a big role in overall cost.

    Minimum Lot Charges Explained

    You may notice a minimum lot charge to bring the total to $120 on some quotes. This isn’t a penalty, it’s simply the baseline cost required to cover the time, labor, and resources needed to properly set up and run a job.

    Even the smallest production order still requires:

    • Programming and setup
    • Equipment and operator time
    • Secondary process setup (if applicable)
    • Quality control and documentation

    A minimum ensures we can deliver consistent quality, accuracy, and turnaround without cutting corners.

    Standardized Quoting = Consistency and Accuracy

    We use a standardized quoting system to ensure consistency across materials, cutting time, and production costs. This allows us to:

    • Quote jobs accurately and fairly
    • Maintain consistent pricing across repeat orders
    • Reflect real-world increases in material and operating costs
    • Provide reliable lead times and expectations

    Manufacturing costs have changed significantly in recent years, and our pricing structure reflects the realities of today’s production environment while still remaining competitive.

    How to Get the Best Value on Your Job

    If you’re flexible, there are a few ways to reduce cost per part:

    • Combine orders to increase quantity
    • Plan ahead for production runs instead of rush one-offs
    • Ask about alternate material thicknesses or nesting options

    We’re always happy to review options and help you find the most efficient approach for your needs.

    A Quick Note About Online Quoting:

    Our online quoting tool is intended for smaller quantities that fall below full sheet yield. Production pricing involves additional considerations and requires a detailed review by our team.

    If you’re planning a production run or evaluating higher quantities, we encourage you to reach out directly so we can provide pricing that accurately reflects production costs, quality requirements, and realistic lead times.

    Our Commitment to You

    At Laser Precision Cutting, our goal isn’t just to quote a job; it’s to be a reliable production partner. That means clear communication, honest pricing, and parts that meet your specifications every time.

    If you ever have questions about a quote, quantity pricing, or production strategy, give us a call. We’re glad to walk through it with you.

  • What I Learned From My Dissertation Journey: A Study on Leadership, Buy-In, and Sustainable Change by Dr. Jerusha Myrick

    Y’all… I did it! On December 4th, I defended my dissertation and passed with no revisions. After a long stretch of grit, determination, and hard work, this chapter is finally complete.

    I put together this reflection for anyone curious about the study, what I learned, and why it matters for leaders, teams, and organizations trying to make real, lasting change.

    What My Study Was All About

    My research explored how transformational leadership behaviors influence employee buy-in and the long-term sustainability of change initiatives—specifically within Lean Six Sigma (LSS) projects.

    Lean Six Sigma gives organizations the data-driven tools to solve problems… but tools don’t create buy-in. People do.

    What my study revealed is that the human side of change can make or break a change initiative and determines if the change initiative is sustainable.

    My study included:

    • A quantitative survey measuring transformational leadership, employee buy-in, and sustainability
    • One focus group that offered real-world stories and insights
    • Triangulation of both sets of data to strengthen conclusions

    My Key Findings

    After analyzing the data, running the stats, and coding the focus group transcript (plus collapsing 36 themes into 10, and then down to the 4 strongest ones), here’s what rose to the top:

    1. Transformational Leadership Strongly Predicts Sustainability

    Leaders who communicate clearly, build trust, recognize their people, stay visible throughout change, and model the behaviors they expect are the leaders whose projects sustain over time.

    In short: You can’t “set it and forget it.”
    Ongoing leadership presence matters.

    2. Employee Buy-In Matters… But It Isn’t Enough Alone

    This one surprised me.

    Even when employees supported the change, buy-in by itself did not guarantee long-term success. Projects fizzled without systems of accountability and continued leadership support.

    Buy-in opens the door, but leadership walks the team through it.

    3. Trust and Visibility Are the Glue

    Both quant and qual data pointed to this truth:
    Teams follow leaders they can see, hear, and trust.

    People were more willing to adopt new processes when leaders:

    • Showed up in the workspace
    • Explained the “why” behind decisions
    • Checked in regularly
    • Celebrated quick wins

    Visibility isn’t micromanagement; it’s relationship building.

    4. Communication and Clarity Keep Projects Alive

    When goals, expectations, and responsibilities were unclear, sustainability suffered.
    When leaders communicated frequently and in simple, consistent language, teams stayed aligned.

    Good communication is oxygen for success.

    The takeaway?
    Even the best tools can’t overcome persistent organizational barriers without leadership commitment.

    What Does All This Mean for Organizations?

    Here’s the big message my study drives home:

     To make change initiatives sustainable, organizations must integrate strong, relational leadership behaviors within the change management framework.

    It’s not an either/or.
    It’s people + process.
    It’s relationship + rigor.
    It’s human leadership + analytical discipline.

    When leaders combine those two worlds, change sticks.

    What This Journey Taught Me Personally

    Beyond the academic findings, the whole process reminded me:

    • Leadership is personal.
    • Trust can’t be automated.
    • Data might tell us what is working, but people tell us whether it will keep working.

    After plenty of moments where I wondered if I’d finish at all, this study taught me something else: Perseverance works.

    Supportive people matter.
    And dreams don’t have deadlines.

  • Fall 2025: South-Tec

    Our last show was the Southeast Manufacturing Technology Series in Greenville, SC, from October 21-23, 2025.

    Thanks to everyone who stopped by. We enjoyed our conversations with both our current and potential customers.

  • LPC Meets with Knife Makers at Blade Show 2025 Atlanta

    If you’ve ever been to Blade Show, you already know—It’s not just a knife show, it’s the knife show.

    On June 6th–8th, the Cobb Galleria in Atlanta turned into the epicenter of the knife world again, and it sure didn’t disappoint. We’re talking over 900 exhibitors, thousands of knife nerds, collectors, makers, YouTubers, and plenty of regular folks just looking too.

    Right out of the gate, booths were packed with artisans & aficionados looking to get their hands on the latest releases. Blade University was back in session too. Whether you wanted to sharpen a blade properly, try your hand at survival skills, or level up your knife making workflow with laser, there was definitely a class for it. 

    This year’s Blade Show had it all—New knives, old friends, great deals, and that buzz you only get when you’re surrounded by people who really get why knives are more than just tools.

    Great getting to shake hands with so many of you, and we hope you all left just as inspired as we were: Beautiful knives in hand, lots of memories made, and already anticipating what you’ll be making with us, in the coming year. Til the next Blade Show!